An alleged altercation between an aide to Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf of Kano State and a journalist has once again brought attention to concerns over the safety and professional freedom of media practitioners in the state.
The incident reportedly occurred at the Race Course in Kano during the Argungu Motor Rally, part of activities marking the Argungu International Fishing and Cultural Festival. It has since generated debate within media circles, with renewed calls for respect, professionalism, and protection for journalists.
The government official involved was identified as Auwal Sani Rogo, a Senior Special Reporter with the Kano State Government, while the journalist at the centre of the controversy, Abdulbaki Ali Ahmed Sharifai, was covering the event in his professional capacity.
Eyewitnesses said the alleged verbal exchange occurred shortly after Sharifai and other journalists conducted interviews at the venue. The event was organised by the Kano State Ministry of Information and Internal Affairs, with journalists officially invited to provide coverage and wider publicity.
The incident reportedly took place in the presence of key government officials, including the Commissioner for Information and Internal Affairs, Ibrahim Abdullahi Waiya; the Commissioner for Culture and Tourism, Aisha Lawan Saji Rano; and the Chairman of the Kano State Censorship Board, Abba El-Mustapha.
Read Also:
Kano Journalist Weighs Legal Action Over Alleged Insult by Govt Aide
Pantami Urges Northern Muslims to Invest in Media, Warns of Communication Deficit
Kano Govt Strengthens Digital Journalism Through Ethics-Focused Media Retreat
Following the incident, Sharifai lodged a formal complaint at the Divisional Police Office in Bompai, headquarters of the Kano State Police Command, citing alleged insults, harassment, and intimidation while carrying out his lawful duties.
Sources familiar with the matter alleged that the government aide did not honour a police invitation, while efforts toward amicable resolution have yet to produce a formal apology or official communication.
Although the commissioner reportedly initiated dialogue and assured intervention, the absence of closure has left the matter unresolved, with indications that legal action may be pursued.
A Pattern of Concern
The incident reflects a growing pattern of tension involving journalists in Kano. Observers recall the arrest of broadcaster Ibrahim Ishaq Dan’uwa Rano on October 18, 2025 over a feature programme titled “Letter from Imalu.”
The report, which used allegory and innuendo, a recognised journalistic technique, was considered defamatory following a petition by Abdullahi Ibrahim Rogo, Director General of Protocol to the governor.
The situation drew widespread concern, particularly as authorities reportedly demanded the production of a fictional character featured in the programme as part of conditions linked to the journalist’s release.
For many observers, such developments highlight a broader challenge, including limited understanding of journalism practice, especially interpretative and investigative storytelling methods.
Press Freedom vs Reality
Nigeria’s constitution guarantees freedom of expression and of the press, positioning journalists as key actors in democracy, often described as the Fourth Estate of the Realm.
Despite these protections, media practitioners in Kano continue to report experiences of intimidation, harassment, and institutional pressure.
At the same time, the Kano State Government has repeatedly affirmed its commitment to press freedom. The administration of Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf, through its spokespersons, maintains that journalists operate freely and that the government remains media friendly.
During a media engagement session, the Director General of Media and Publicity, Sanusi Dawakin Tofa, reiterated that the governor supports transparency and open communication, dismissing claims of systemic harassment.
However, recurring incidents such as the Sharifai case continue to raise questions about the gap between policy and practice.
Why in Kano?
The persistence of such cases raises a critical question on why incidents involving journalists appear frequent in Kano.
Analysts point to several underlying factors, including limited understanding of journalism ethics, political sensitivities, weak institutional safeguards, and a culture where critical reporting is sometimes perceived as a challenge to authority.
Stakeholders emphasise the need for balance and understanding. Government officials and security agencies are urged to respect press freedom and deepen their understanding of media practice. Journalists, on their part, are expected to uphold professionalism, accuracy, and responsibility.
A strong and independent media remains essential for accountability, governance, and peaceful coexistence. Observers note that the outcome of the Sharifai case may serve as a test of the state’s commitment to press freedom, not only in principle but in practice.